Compare and contrast the use of full arch impost trays, full arch stock trays, quadrant stock trays and the Triple Tray for accuracy when used in impressing full coverage maven crowns. Is there any data to suggest one tray over the others when impressing RPDs? FPDs In my analysis, I found an assortment of studies presenting various findings for each tray type for impressing unmarried coverage and multiple unit restorations. It fronts to be generally real that full arch custom trays are the best when impressing iodin units and multiple units due to the ability to control impression sensible thickness and their accuracy ratio. Though custom trays whitethorn be superior, stock trays (especially when rigid metal is used) do not ancestry far behind when impressing maven units, but, custom trays still entertain a quite an large lead when it comes to impressing multiple units. Also, for single units, triple trays are only indicated when the patient has a rather stable occlusion and posterior stops in MIP.
Discrepancies may still be observed when using this technique. With that said, triple trays are not the best option. Quadrant trays present with some of the problems that triple trays do but seem to fair better when impressing single units, with one study all the same suggesting that quadrant trays may even be superior to the use of full arch trays. I will attempt to put forth some of the data and make a conclusion of my own as to which tray systems seem to be best for impressing both single and multiple units. First, I will address full arch trays, both custom and stock. Though many systems are out there for the dentist to use, one fact remains constant, more rigid trays and more rigid material produce more...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment