James Sidney Lucas' War on the Eastern Front

. .the Russians can non avoid a conclusion as they did in 1812. Modern armed forces of one century divisions cannot abandon their sources of supply. It is anticipated that the Russian ground forces will persist to do battle in a defensive function protecting Great Russia and the Eastern Ukraine" (Lucas, 1998, 6).

That statement, along with being boring, is too vain. Lucas makes the assumption that everyone reading it will "know" that the 1812 decision refers to Bonaparte, and the Russian scorched earth policy. This is on page six of the password, and the critic reader is still act to get the tactical bearings, and he becomes with negating strategy. Of course, Lucas is said to not be writing a armament history, but a biography of the war, from the point of view, we assume, of the little guy.

The book is divided into topical chapters rather than any linear development. We begin with "Operation Barbarossa" and then are invited to meet the German Army. other chapters feature different topics such as "The exit Army of Workers and Peasants" (Chapter 6, pp. 44-51) and then we are given "Two German Views of the Red Army" (Chapter 7, pp. 51-55). Curiously, this approach tends to ignore the fact (seemingly obvious fact) that the Germans were the encroaching(a) Army, and that the Red Army of peasants was fighting to defend the homeland.

At the end of the summer of 1940, Adolf Hitler was the master of Continental Europe. The Armed Forces of the Third Reich, whose Supreme Commander he was, had conquered an pudding stone which ran from the Channel coast to the river Bug in Poland and from the Coast to the the Alps (Lucas, 1998, 2).

Of course, this is because he draws from letters, diaries, oral histories and related accounts to depict the war at the everyday take. As a result, there is no word of honor of strategic or tactical events in the war, even though it would have helped immensely to have the briefest of summaries since the impact of the observations becomes weaker without a perspective. Observations in the book suggests that the individual experiences with the personalized (death, missing of loved ones, the confounded cause, etc.

) and physical (combat, weather, marching, etc.) hardships on the front lines seem to impact the Germans more than than the Russians.

This is perhaps due to the bias that Lucas developed, where he tends to admire the Germans more than the Russians, and therefore tends to focus on the bases of comradeship and the intensity of the personal/unit bonds that form in training/combat. But Lucas does not let us get inside the mind (or perfume or soul) of the foot soldier. Possibly this is because he is incapable of this level of understanding. Consider the lack of reality in the first some words of his book.

Of course, it is possible that he does see Hitler as a hero, and all of Hitler's soldiers as heroes, fighting the good fight and trying to conquer Europe. Such a consideration is frightening, since it suggests a level of revisionistic history that is mind boggling. One can imagine Lucas writing about Osama Bin Laden as having conquered the infidels. Of course, Osama and Hitler did share the integrate bond of hatred. They twain hated Jews, they both hated homosexuals, they both hated intellectuals, and they both hated anyone who disagreed with them.

Lucas likes to find people to qu
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!