Supreme Court Case in Pursuit of the Defendant U.S. v. Leon

Leon. Each of these phenomena provided government prosecutors motivations to track the United States v. Leon through the appeal process in the locution of a finding that the original search warrant was defective, and to each one of these phenomena provided the justices in the majority on the United States Supreme judicatory with justifications for their rationale in the selection and application of decision criteria.

well-nigh American politicians and public prosecutors in the firsthalf of the mid-eighties were fond of proclaiming that foreign drug lords and domestic drug pushers were inebriation America's youth. Public and governmental attitudes toward the substance call of iniquitous narkotic substances were hard influenced by perceptions of the country's larger drug business. The larger drug hassle in the United States, however, had three major facial expressions. First, on that point was the illegal use of illegal narcotic substances, wherein abuse, trafficking, and control efforts were exacting abundant costs on American society. Second, there was the recreational use of legal substances, the consumption of which was also exacting enormous various(prenominal) and societal costs. This facet of the larger problem was concerned primarily with alcohol and tobacco use. The third facet of the larger problem involved the abuse of prescription drugs in the United States. This facet of the larger problem was complicated and contentious. at that place was no question, however, that the abuse of prescription drugs was as capa

There is general agreement that value cause attitudes, but there is not a onetoone human relationship amongst particular attitudes and particular values. Rather, a single attitude is "caused" by many valuesby one's whole value system, in fact. In what are generally called consistency theories, investigators have seek to discover the relationships among principles, feelings, and behavioral tendencies. Chief among these consistency theories is the theory of cognitive dissonance. According to this theory, inconsistency between cognitive elementsbeliefs, attitudes, and so forrard collars to dissonance. This dissonance, in turn, leads an individual to change one or to a greater goal cognitive elements, in an attempt to eliminate the unpleasant state.

value and attitudes, together with their structure, lead to or determine social behavior. This relationship holds great significance, as values are seen to be systematically related to behavioral outcomes. Values affect, influence, or otherwise lead to certain behaviors. Within this context, individuals behave purposively; that is, they act because they believe that much(prenominal) action will lead to a desired outcome. To the extent that individuals can rationalize their beliefs or believe that individual values will lead to certain outcomeswhether mistaken or not, it whitethorn be said that values influence behavior. In such instances, individuals do not necessarily have to understand what motivates them precisely, or to separate their motivating beliefs from other values in their belief system. Indeed, to another observer, their beliefs may appear prejudiced or irrational. The come in is whether they attribute their goal to a specific belief or set of beliefs, and then act accordingly; not to the nicety of their beliefs. In that sense, value leads to behavior.

The case of the United States v. Leon began in 1981 when an author communicated to police in Burbank, California information concerning persons selling controlled narc
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!