Who are These Blue Collar Workers?

In this article, Peikes explains how the commitments produced to a single at-will employee that her husband's possible employment by a competitor would not adversely affect her work had been sufficiently clear to be binding on her employer. The Connecticut Supreme Court affirming an $850,000 jury verdict. The Court determined that the employee's at-will career popularity was modified after the employer promised she would not be fired even if her husband accepted work having a competitor company. The Supreme Court rejected the employer's argument that the choice to terminate its employee had practically nothing to complete with the decision by her husband to accept work with a competitor company, noting instead how the employment-at-will doctrine was not applicable because the employee had been given assurances that she would not be terminated (Peikes 109-110). If this situation teaches employers anything, it should be that the doctrine of employment-at-will does not supply a safe harbor or safe haven for organizations which are sued by former employees claiming how the statements or actions in the business with respect to their popularity as at will employees had changed.

According to Dana Shilling in her book Human Resources and also the Law" a blue-collar employee has the appropriate to quit his or her employment inside United States at any time and for any reason, no matter how inconvenient doing so can be for his or her employer.

An example in the way exceptions for the employment-at-will doctrine enhance task laws relates to anti-retaliation statutes. Generally, an employer cannot terminate an employee mainly because he or she exercised a appropriate granted by federal or nation law. For example, a worker can not be terminated mainly because he or she filed a workers compensation claim, a sexual harassment claim, or a claim alleging that he or she did not receive the full quantity of income such as overtime pay that he or she was entitled to receive.

Shilling writes that the exceptions towards the employment-at-will doctrine are great to employers because they offer employers suggestions about what is and what is not regarded as reasonable and proper grounds for termination of an employee. Shilling suggests that modifications to the doctrine of employment-at-will also protect employees from discrimination from the workplace. Shilling writes that to overcome the presumption that their career was at will, a terminated employee have to prove that there was an work contract or that an exception to the at-will doctrine was produced by statute, or by decisions made by Region or federal courts. 1 popular way that the doctrine of employment-at-will can also be altered involves statements created in writing or verbally by an employer. An instance of this would be a statement to employees not subject to any written employment contract or collective bargaining agreement that for as long as the modern management owns or controls the business that no employee will ever be laid off since there's not more than enough work for him or her to perform.

 

Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!