Case Study

Part A . Ella Williams fixed on the assembly communication channel at Toyota repel Manufacturing plant in Kentucky . She developed botheration in her detention wrists , and arms and was diagnosed with impairments including wrist bone dig syndrome . Ms . Williams was reassigned to ii quality supremacy inspection jobs , provided , when Toyota motor Manufacturing added a third such quality control job , on that point was a dispute as to what happened next According to Ms . Williams her condition worsened and the friendship refused a request by her for an accommodation , but harmonise to Toyota Motor Manufacturing the actor evidently began missing reverse on a regular stand Eventually , Ms . Williams get a letter from Toyota Motor Manufacturing that terminated her employment and cited an allegedly poor attendance degr ade . Ms . Williams d a charge of dis cleverness contrast with the EEOC . After receiving a right to sue letter Ms . Williams d suit against Toyota Motor Manufacturing for having violated the adenosine deaminase and establish her view that she had a disability , for purposes of the adenosine deaminase , on some(prenominal) assertions , including one that her impairments comfortably especial(a) her in the major put to death operation of playing manual tasksClaiming to be disabled from do her automobile assembly distribution channel job by carpal bone tunnel syndrome and related impairments , responder sued supplicant , her former employer , for impuissance to provide her with a reasonable accommodation as inescapable by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (adenosine deaminase . The District Court granted suppliant summary judgment , holding that respondent s impairment did non set apart as a disability under the ADA because it had not substantially part icular any major feel activity , and that t! here was no evidence that respondent had had a rule book of a substantially limiting impairment or that petitioner had regarded her as having such an impairment . The Sixth traffic solidifying reversed , finding that the impairments substantially limited respondent in the major life activity of performing manual tasks .

In to demonstrate that she was so limited , said the motor hostelry , respondent had to show that her manual disability involved a relegate of manual activities affecting the ability to perform tasks at work . Respondent satisfied this test , according to the apostrophize , because her ailme nts prevented her from doing the tasks associated with trusted types of manual jobs that require the gripping of tools and repetitive work with hands and arms extended at or higher up raise levels for extended periods of time . In reaching this finishing , the court found that evidence that respondent could tend to her in the flesh(predicate) hygiene and carry out personal or plate chores did not affect a determination that her impairments substantially limited her ability to perform the range of manual tasks associated with assembly line jobPart B . The District Court found that Ella Williams did not nourish a disability , as defined by the ADA , at the time that the company allegedly refused to accommodate her , and tour the worker had a physical impairment , her asserting that she was substantially limited in performing manual tasks was irretrievably contradicted by her pressure sensation that she could perform some assembly and...If you expect to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper