'Adolescence Paper Essay\r'

'Adolescence is a period of well-disposedization where children word relationships step forwardside of the family. These relationships further fuel or heighten their perceptions of the world, their bonding with surrounding society members and their view of pitying interactions. In an environment where there is a removed(p) m new(prenominal) or absent father, where the child is plunge to put unmatchable over jobs acting soci everyy median(prenominal) with other tidy sum, the soulfulness is coiffed as a deviant. non e actuallyone who has been subjected to the above purposes leave alone go on to puzzle a self-importance-mutilator, only when these types of adolescent girls argon or clear been defined by these destinations.\r\nIt becomes app arent then, that first childhood development is essential to creating an individuation and further more than to creating a sound human be who is non prone to acts of aggression. In the theme of this paper, the theory of trans awakenual activityism will be discussed. Although the theory of socialization is a very strong indicator of moral values and actions, it does not indicate sexual disposition. The theories of biota are more aptly considered to be the reason for sexual persuasion, and in the argument for this paper, transgenderism will be proven to be biological, not mental, or sociological.\r\nSee more: roof budgeting essay\r\nThe purpose in the role of a transgendered mortal is in the comment of identity. It is any soulfulness’s right to discover their true self and to present that self to society. The problem that society has with a transgendered person is that society is often clock eluded by this identity. Anything or anyone who defies definition, that cannot be exactly categorized, becomes a ‘problem’ in society. However, where the discussion of this paper is concerned much(prenominal) a ‘problem’ is beyond its scope, thus, the issue of ident ity and the rejection of that identity by society will be discussed.\r\nFirst, a transgendered person is a person who defies a specific gender role. Men are well-read by society to not be a sissy, to be superior and tough. As Tucker-Ladd states in his rule book psychological Self-Help, â€Å"And, what makes a woman a â€Å" great(p) catch?” What makes women sexy? A pretty grammatical construction and a great body! Women compete on the basis of their looks.\r\nThis may interfere with women’s pauperization to achieve and be successful. Oprah recently asked young people which they would rather be: attractive or good for you(p)? An amazing percentage said attractive. What counts in this refinement is how attractive you are, especially if you are a woman.” (2000). Thus, it would appear that a transgendered person would look at the benefits of either gender, provided this is not the case.\r\nGoing back to the idea of identity, a transgendered person is both genders. This does not however crystalise that person as a hermaphrodite which is being natural with both sexes conk outal sexual organs. A transgendered person has attributes of either sex, as their biological musical composition pertaining to psychological contexts designs behavior. Often times such an individual(a) is a man who has, or who desires to be female, or vice versa.\r\nAlthough society has many sexual deviants in its subcultures, a transgendered person is not a transsexual, which is a specified gender dressing in the other gender’s clothes. Instead, a transgendered identity pertains to defying or including to a smaller extent the gender depute to them at birth. Thus, the dua keep downic nature and the confusion of this, is the chasten of the transgender definition.\r\nTherefore, by the above stated definition of a transgendered person, they should be considered social deviants inasmuch as society fails to define this subculture. The thesis of this p aper rests upon the fact that a transgendered person does not choose that they are transgendered but instead, their psychological make-up adheres to one sex’s social role definition more than the biological make-up. Thus, although transgender is a defiance of biota, it is likewise a deviance of societal norms, as Sandy Stone states,\r\nTransgender is a term whose exact meaning is still in dispute, and I consider that a very healthy sign. The closely widely accepted definition is that transgender includes everything not cover by our culture’s narrow ground â€Å"man” and â€Å"woman”. A partial list of persons who might include themselves in such a definition includes transsexuals (pre, post, and no-op); transvestites; cross dressers; persons with ambiguous genitalia; persons who deplete chosen to perform ambiguous social genders; and persons who have chosen to perform no gender at all (Stone, paragraph One).\r\nAgainst this idea that transgendered people are transgender due to psychology is the fact that often times the transgender definition includes (as stated by Stone) other social deviants whose identity is not guided by psychology but biology such as ambiguous genitals, or the people who choose a received lifestyle.\r\n The argument of this paper is that choice is not a factor in determining transgendered people. Instead, it is inherent in them, and is not under the guise of socialization, or biology. The concept of choice is one which defies the rules of constructed psychology. Along the alike lines that a schizophrenic cannot choose their dementia or a serial killer their disposition to kill, so does the definition of a transgendered person escape choice.\r\nThus, although Stone’s definition of a transgendered person is inclusive, it should not be so inclusive as to apply to these heterogeneous subgroups of social deviants. There is a difference amongst a transgendered person and a transsexua l, transvestite, etc. spell some have to do with choice (transsexual), others have to do with complete changing of their sex (as in a transsexual). A transgendered person is biologically one sex, and yet performs attitudes, functions, reactions and thoughts according to social definitions of the other gender’s role.\r\n Although culture has implications on the role of gender, the technicalities of which cannot be aptly portrayed in this essay. It is however in this scope of this essay to mention that while biology caters to the transsexual, psychology is the format by which a transgendered person obtains their social role. Although some contest to the fact of biology being a main component in transgender identity as Stone states,\r\nSocial constructivists consider that both sex and gender arise in social interaction and have no macrocosm independent of social interaction; i.e., they are not grounded in â€Å"nature”, the meaning of which is itself soc ially determined. The â€Å"constructedness” of sex and gender is made invisible by the normal workings of social life, so that they appear pictorial rather than artificial.\r\nRecent constructivist theory also points out that the idea of two absolute chromosomal sexes is also a social construction. Recall the film outsider 3, in which the inhabitants of the prison colony are all double-Y chromosomal; thus although they possess many of the alternative sexual characteristics of males, genetically they are not male, nor are they any other category for which we currently have a socially understood name (Stone, paragraph Six).\r\nThe fact remains that a transgender person is born with appropriate body functions, and their chemical make-up is no different than other person’s with the same gender. Therefore the reliance on psychology, not the function of sociology and the socialization of gender through cultural awareness, but the psychological components which determine if a person is a genius, serial killer, etc. are the same for finding the reason behind transgendered people.\r\nWork Cited\r\nStone, S. Transgender. Online. Accessed: May 11, 2007.\r\n < http://sandystone.com/trans.html>\r\nTucker-Ladd, Clayton, E. Psychological Self-Help. 2000. <www.mentalhelp.net/psyhelp/chap9/chap9p.htm>\r\n'