Good afternoon adjudicator, chairperson and members
of the audience. Firstly I would like to repudiate the
misleading argument the first loudspeaker of the affirmative
team stated. No matter where you see or go, Australia
is unique it does not have a double this is not a game, no
other artless is the same. We disagree with the
affirmative teams definition. We believe the topic
should be defined as We: Us Australians Losing:
Suffering deprivation of Individuality: The aggregate of
qualities that characterize and distinguish a nation from
other nations. Altogether: Australia is not suffering
deprivation of the sum of qualities, which characterize
and distinguish it from other nations. I the first speaker of
the negative team will be speaking somewhat Australias urge
to become a republic, an individuals point of view when
it comes to government, Aboriginal expiation and our
presence in the world form. The second speaker will
speak about identity in the daily life of an Australian,
Living in a planetary media environment and the film
industry. The third speaker will sum up our case. Australias
urge to become a republic really shows Australias
individuality. On the sixth November 1999 there was a
referendum.
The vote was a conduct of a roll that has
lingered throughout Australias history and gathered
momentum after the dismissal of the Whitlam government.
The call was so close nearly half of the Australian
population wanted to change the governmental system set up
at Federation in 1901. Most the great unwashed knew that Australia could
stand on its own two feet without Great Britains hand for
support. The result of the referendum made all the people really
realize how different Australia was from its so-called mother
country. They to a fault realised at that stage that they should not
have to answer to another country but to their...
If you want to get a full essay, parliamentary law it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment